Sustaining Liberty - Plural Marriage

I'm not sure if this should be a topic of Sustaining Liberty or Clown World... but here it is. I will attempt to put a humorous twist on a sad development.

Folks, I honestly don't have a position on polygamy or poly-amorous relationships.  I'm not saintly or such...  I just don't think I could make the effort to give happiness to two (or more) women when it is so much easier to accept continuous disappointment from one.  LOL

• Hmmm, on the other hand... maybe multiple females would keep each other in line and leave me alone!   Maybe the Lion King is a genius.. But he looks tired... maybe from hunting all day to feed his women...  Ha, Ha,  They feed him.  I may have a theory on why he's tired.  LOL
  

OK, getting serious for a moment, this is a story of Progressive hypocrisy.

The Past
The Church of Latter Day Saints (aka The Mormons,  aka LDS).  Allowed polygamy as an aspect of their religion.  This irritated Easterners for some reason and in 1862 the US Congress passed the Morrill Act, which prohibited plural marriage.  The law was never enforced due to the Reconstruction and the impracticality of attempting to control people so far away.

Polygamy remained (legally) a 3rd degree felony in Utah until 2020 when it was reduced to a misdemeanor.

The Present
OK.. with the historical context in place please enjoy the woke, Progressive twist.

A judge in New York has just ruled that polyamorous relationships - in this particular court case a 3-person unit living together in an apartment - are entitled to the same legal protection as opposite-sex or same-sex 2-person marriages.

In other words, there can now be legal marriages of three or more persons... and it may be any combination of the 87 possible genders.  The Court, mocking conservatives,  says

• "American conservatism has long mourned the proliferation of single parents, but, if two parents are better than one, why are three parents worse?"

Solid legal logic... wouldn't you say??... I disagree.

I will  answer the snarky comment from the  dishonorable Judge... three (or more) parents are indeed worse if the State cannot determine biological lineage of children.  When the four or five (or more) parents of vague gender adopt and transition a couple of kids... who gets the kids when the relationship implodes?  If none of them are the biological parents how do the courts untangle the Gordian Knot?

A 'family' is not about your sexual amusement... a family is about the next generation.

Hypocrisy
Again, I make no moral judgement, but the elite dishonesty is sickening. The Mormons have been demonized for 150 years for practicing polygamy (in a strict religious setting, btw).  And now those same Progressive elites want to legitimize and normalize their urban promiscuous freak shows.

Perhaps I'm over-reacting but the pic on the left does not make me think of the pic on the right.

Conclusion
In closing, American (mostly urban) society is in decline and granting legal status to orgies and promiscuity is just another step toward disintegration.

I honestly don't know if I should be irritated or if I should just make some popcorn and wait for the legal shitshows to begin on reality TV.   Here are my predictions for Sitcoms/Dramas of the (very near) future. (I iz a prophet, after all... it's a small world, after all)

• Father Knows Best              ->    Fathers Know Best  (Starring Pete and Chastain)
• Leave It To Beaver              ->    Too Much Beaver   (Self explanatory. BIG Beaver, Hilarious)
• With Six You Get Eggroll     ->    With Six You Get Gonorrhea  (A fight for medical equality)
• Little House on The Prairie  ->    Little Commune In The CHAZ (Growing grubs in boxes. Heroic)
• Paladin                                ->    Have Vibrator, Will Travel (Might be too edgy... nah go with it)
• Cinderella                            ->    Darn it Disney already made a woke version.. can't get ahead
  
• My Three Sons                    ->   Sorry guys... I'm not even gonna touch this one...
  

As a pop-quiz, and a future prestigious career opportunity, if you can figure out the chart below (and lots of additional charts with more 'partners') then you WILL be a candidate for the Supreme Court in 2030. 

You will NOT need a Law Degree to qualify for the Supreme Court (in the future)... The new neoTerra University of Equity Studies will be offering an advanced degree in Moral Superiority and Justification  Best of all, the Gov will pay for it!!   Enroll Now!!   Classes for the Fall Semester are filling up fast!!

(Click the pic... but don't get sick).